Email this page to a friend!

 

 

 

AEC Newsletter archive:

 

Issue 1 May 5, 1999

Issue 2 May 15, 1999

Issue 3 June 1, 1999

Issue 4 June 15, 1999

Issue 5 July 1, 1999

Issue 6 July 15, 1999

Issue 7 August 1, 1999

Issue 8 August 15, 1999

Issue 9 September 1, 1999

Issue 10 September 15, 1999

Issue 11 October 1, 1999

Issue 12 October 15, 1999

Issue 13 November 1, 1999

Issue 14 November 15, 1999

Issue 15 December 1, 1999

Issue 16 December 15, 1999

Issue 17 January 18, 2000

Issue 18 January 27, 2000

Issue 19 February 3, 2000

Issue 20 February 23, 2000

Issue 21 March 2, 2000

Issue 22 March 17, 2000

Issue 23 April 3, 2000

Issue 24 April 17, 2000

Issue 25 May 1, 2000

Issue 26 May 17, 2000

Issue 27 June 3, 2000

Issue 28 June 20, 2000

Issue 29 July 6, 2000

Issue 30 July 17, 2000

Issue 31 August 1, 2000

Issue 32 August 17, 2000

Issue 33 September 1, 2000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back to CADENCE Newsletter Main Page

 

Geoffrey Moore Langdon

CADENCE AEC Tech News # 29 (July 7, 2000)

AEC Tech News 7/7/2000

 

Where is the Cup ?

I have been inundated with hundreds of emails from designers asking who won the Designers 3D CAD Shootout, who obviously were too busy to notice that we changed the format, but still want to keep abreast of how the state of the art is moving along. The answer is that we did not choose one - as it is a subjective call whether design/build oriented software is better than, say, AE oriented software - but that you can choose the right one for your particular firm by looking at the drawings each Team could do (in the same amount of time, with the same information) which are posted now online at bricsnet.com (user and password of "shootout") along with comments from our jury panel. We did have a wide range of software solutions, from 2D drafting software combined with sister 3D modeling software (VersaCAD and 3D Joy), to aE software (MicroStation TriForma), to software that only does sophisticated 3D modeling (FormZ), in addition to several that have smart architectural parametric objects (ArchiCAD, VectorWorks Architect, ChiefArchitect, Arris).

Essentially, all of those just mentioned "win" the right to display the Architectural CADD Cup and logo. You may ask, though, where did the Cup actually go. Well, at the moment, it is currently in my living room, and after we inscribe it with the names of the participants this year it will be on display at the Boston Society of Architects, and at Build Boston where we will also present an analysis on this years Teams. The various Teams (and others) also do have the opportunity to show us, step by step, how good they are in the ongoing online CADD Web Challenge, where we can also establish who are the best expert CADD users.

Greatbuildings.com

Need a photograph of the single style Newport Casino ? Need the plans for the Robie house ? Need all the reference books on the Sukiya style of architecture ? Need a 3D CADD model of Fallingwater ? Want to know all of the projects Corbu did ? Need a context model for the Design Shootout ? Then turn to the best resource online for architects, researchers, and students at greatbuildings.com.

Created as a free resource for the architectural community by Artifice Inc., it does benefit them as well as it demonstrates that you can indeed model all those great buildings out there with their DesignWorkshop modeling software. We encourage architects everywhere to explore this great resource, and to contribute and get credit for any photographs or models you submit.

ChiefArchitect

A true surprise this year was the ease with which the ChiefArchitect designers rapidly developed the building design at the shootout. Over the years, despite the name, ChiefArchitect has become known as a favorite of builders and design/build firms, partly due to its automatic wood framing and cost analysis, but mainly due to the fact that it is incredibly easy to use. So easy, in fact, that a cut back version is sold in computer supermarkets as 3D HomeArchitect. Such ease of use, however, normally has drawbacks in flexibility, as a ton of assumptions must be behind creating a whole building in seconds.

There are several ways that ChiefArchitect has approached design flexibility while keeping that phenomenal ease of use - first they have a 2D CADD drafting component, so that if something cannot be explicitly modeled, a designer can always add it line by line to the extracted plans or elevations, secondly, they are continually adding new smart parametric objects to their library, and finally, they give the designers the ability to model new objects and add them themselves. The basic 3 story building layout and development was a snap for the Team (and we were pleased to know that they had also done 4 story buildings in the past), so the big challenges were going to be the detailed timber frame entrance, the deck dormers, the custom door, and the other required 3D elements. The strange thing was that, in showing off their ability to do different variations on our rustic theme, they forgot that they had a stone building shown on all the exterior views and an unmistakably log frame building as seen from the interior. The dormers they set as gables right down to the same roof plate line, putting the decks alongside the building instead of cut into the roof. The timber frame entrance detail they left out, but they put triangular and trapezoidal windows into the end walls to make the building feel like a timber frame structure. They used standard library pieces as approximations for the railings, stair, and fireplace, and used a 3D cone element for the fireplace chimney. They left out the custom door altogether.

Whether their adaptations were due to limitations of the software in those areas or the understandable lack of time in our blitzdesign will not be clear until they submit those missing elements in the CADD Web Challenge, which does not have a time limit. In the meantime, we will have to judge the software by what we can see - that it is great for quickly laying out reasonably conventional buildings, and will automatically produce coordinated plans/sections/elevations and perspectives. It does not seem to have super rendering or animation or site design tools, or a facileness to deal with unusual custom details, at least in 3D. What they can do, and they showed us several times during the charrette, so it must be easy, is to generate a wood framing model (and lumber cost cut-list) for the whole project.

Links :

Designers 3D CAD Shootout =http://www.architecturalcadd.com/shootout.htm

Drawings and Results = http://www.bricsnet.com

Web Challenge = http://www.architecturalcadd.com/cup/webchallenge.html

Boston Society of Architects = http://www.architects.org

Build Boston = http://www.buildboston.com

Greatbuildings.com = http://www.greatbuildings.com

Artifice Inc. = http://www.artifice.com

ChiefArchitect = http://www.chiefarch.com


About Geoffrey Moore Langdon, AIA

Prof. Langdon is a registered architect and is the principal of Architectural CADD Consultants, a firm that specializes in helping architectural firms with computing and CADD. He has taught Design, Solar Energy, and Architectural CADD at a number of colleges in the Boston area. He is the author of Architectural CADD: A Resource Guide to Design and Production Software Appropriate for Architects, a guest speaker at many AIA events, and the founder and organizer of the Designers 3D CAD Shootout competition. contact him at aectechnews@architecturalcadd.com, or through his website: http://www.architecturalcadd.com


Home | Current Issue | Back Issues | News | Advertise | Code Archive | Contact | CADShop | Subscribe for Free |

© 1997-2000 Miller Freeman, Inc. All rights Reserved.